3750-metro frustrations. Worth it??

I am incredibly frustrated, and I’m hoping this post will save countless others from yelling out loud, after finding out you wasted money and hours of troubleshooting for no reason.

First off, a bit of history. Back in my historical posts, I mentioned my thoughts on the 3750-metro series switches. At first, I wasn’t all that impressed with the metro-series. I mean, it seems to be more for the service provider than for the customer. But, if Cisco recommends it for a customer, I should listen, right?

Well, Cisco sales reps are more interested in selling products, than in giving the best answers, and this is a perfect example. So, make sure to listen up, and pay attention.

In building our metro network, we have a fiber line, provided by AT&T. On the customer side, AT&T installed a Cisco switch to terminate the fiber, and hand-off copper. I then, take the copper into my network. But, after connecting my 3750-metro interface (The ES port, for “Enhanced Services”), I never saw a link. Hmmm… did AT&T enable their interface? I asked…. yep. Do I need a cross-over, or did they build the cross-over in their patchpanel? Nope. Straight-through. So, I must provide the cross-over
(And for those that will ask… no I do not trust the auto-sensing MDIX).

Still no luck.

Then, I asked AT&T the interface characteristics: (100Mbit - Full Duplex). Hmmmm…. shouldn’t be a problem. I’ll set my interface to that. What?? I can’t. It only accepts 1000? Let’s look at the docs:

Now, I consider myself a respectful and considerate human being (at times). However, I must say, when I realized that, I was glad I was in an isolated room with no one around. Because I yelled and cussed as I used to when I was a sailor in the Navy. At this point, I realized I have spent between $6k to $8k more than I needed to (I bought 2 metro switches, one for each side of the link), and I just wasted 3 to 4 hours of troubleshooting. I should have gone with my initial feelings about the 3750-metro.

So, what is the difference between the 3750 and the 3750-metro? From Cisco’s website:

Q. What is the difference between the Cisco Catalyst 3750 Metro Series and the Cisco Catalyst 3750 Series?

A. The Cisco Catalyst 3750 Metro Series is built for Metro Ethernet access in a customer location, enabling the delivery of more differentiated Metro Ethernet services. These switches feature bidirectional hierarchical QoS and Traffic Shaping, intelligent 802.1Q tunneling with class-of-service (CoS)
mutation, VLAN translation, MPLS, EoMPLS, and Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS) support, and redundant AC or DC power. They are ideal for service providers seeking to deliver profitable business services, such as Layer 2, Layer 3, and MPLS VPNs, in a variety of bandwidths and with different SLAs. With flexible software options, the Cisco Catalyst 3750 Metro Series offers a cost-effective path for meeting current and future service requirements from service providers.

And what is this “ES Port” thing. What does it do for me?

Q. What are the Enhanced Services (ES) ports?

A. The Cisco Catalyst 3750 Metro Series includes two SFP-based ES ports. The ES ports support Metro Ethernet features that are vital for delivering profitable business services, such as Layers 2 and 3 and MPLS VPNs, in several bandwidths and with different SLAs. Supported features on the ES ports
include EoMPLS, MPLS, MPLS VPNs, bidirectional hierarchical QoS, intelligent 802.1Q tunneling (Q-in-Q) with CoS mutation, and VLAN ID translation.

So, to summarize, pretty much every enhancement the metro-line offers, is in the ES ports. Other than the redundant power-supplies, this is a wash. The regular Cisco 3750 still has a powerful QoS engine, and the same IOS commands. Now, I’m sure there is more in the metro software image than the standard 3750, but without the ES Ports, what’s the point??? The provider will provide the Q-in-Q tunneling, the heirarchical QoS, etc. What good does it do??

I’m still a little bitter, but by the time you post your comments, maybe I’ll feel better, and listen more. So feel free to let me know what you think. Right now, I’m disappointed, and frankly, quite pi$$ed, because I feel like I was taken advantage of.

My only advice is…. if you get the Cisco 3750-metro, please make sure the provider will hand off a 1000 Gigabit connection. Otherwise, you are sitting on an expensive 3750.

The only thing I can think of, is to place a media-converter in the middle, so I can use the 100Mbit ES interface. But, that just adds another point-of-failure, and this metro network was supposed to alleviate the failures… not add to them…..

((Sigh))

Cleveland - MAN (Datacenter recolation)

Well, I’m off to Cleveland this week. I’ll be bringing up our first MAN to a new co-located datacenter at Expedient.  We currently have one cabinet there, but look to getting a second cabinet in a few more months, depending on how great it works out.

The only thing I do not like about the 3750-metro switches is that they don’t have a netflow export option.  Personally, I think they should.  Being a multi-layer switch, and intended to be on each side of a MAN, the netflow export would be perfect to analyze the traffic across the MAN link.

What do you all think?  Agree to disagree?

For me, it will be a learning experience.  This will be my first time using the Cisco 3750-metro series switches (I’ve used the 3750’s before but the metro’s allow more fine-grained control on QoS and packet-shaping, though, I lose the Gb interfaces).

I’ll need that QoS and packet-shaping skils, since we only have a 20M fiber link between the two locations, and we’ll be sending voice and video through it, on top of regular data traffic.

To be honest, I’m not that confident in my QoS knowledge.  Yes, I know the fundamentals (at least I think I do…. uh oh), but I’m always nervous I’ll forget one tiny little thing, which will cause disastrous results.  Ah well…. I feel that way everytime I touch a keyboard key.

Wish me luck!

Technorati Tags: cisco, 3750, metro, expedient

Powered by ScribeFire.

New Cisco Certification

Cisco has created a new certification called CCDE (Cisco Certified Design Expert).  So, what’s so different between a Design Professional (CCDP) and a Design Expert (CCDE)?

Seniority and includes Business strategies, says Cisco:

“There’s not going to be a lot of CCDEs walking the street,” said David
Bump, a portfolio manager with Cisco. “It’s a very senior credential;
it’s a very exclusive credential.”

Basically, you will take the technical knowledge of the CCDP (and other certifications), but rather than design a technical network around specific requirements, you would be the one to create those requirements, maintain budgets, and make sure those requirements fits the business needs, not just the technical needs.

The 2-hour qualification exam is released today at Pearson VUE centers.  Once you have qualified, you will be able to take the 8-hour long Proctored exam, made available this fall.

No doubt, many CCIE’s will try to get this “higher” status.  Me?  Well, I’ve been using and building Cisco networks for almost 7 years now.  I still don’t have my CCNA!!  No time for the weary, I guess.  Yeah yeah… I know I should…..

For those of you, who didn’t know that, I probably just knocked my credibility down by 2 notches or so.  Sorry to let you down.

Link to Referenced work:

Cisco announces Design Expert Certification for network engineers

Cool…

Technorati Tags: cisco, certification, ccde

Powered by ScribeFire.

The coolest laptop EVER!!

Okay, so I must say… I was astounded by this laptop when I first noticed it. This is just too cool! I am just amazed at the creativity and innovation at Apple. Can I work there?????

Seriously, this laptop just rocks. It is so thin, you can put it in a memo-sized manilla envelope. And the touchpad has the same technology as the iPod touch and iPhone (i.e. rotate, zoom-in, zoom-out, and swipe). Of course, it wouldn’t be an apple machine without the built-in i-sight camera.

Oh, and the keyboard is backlit, automatically. So, when the laptop senses decreased lighting, it will actually start to illuminate the keys. You have no idea how great this would be in a meeting presentation, or on an airplane!

I’m just astonished at the size of this laptop. Obviously, the hard drive must be solid-state, which means no moving parts. I’d be afraid to break the thing!!

Check out the guided tour here.

Cisco Timestamps - Converting

This was so freaking confusing for me! In Java, I would convert my timestamps one way, but then, if I needed to convert them in Excel, I was 70 years off?!? WTF.

Well, here’s how you convert those timestamps to something meaningful, and why you are getting different results with different systems.

First, some terms:

Unix Epoch: number of seconds elapsed since Jan 1, 1970

NTP Epoch: number of seconds elapsed since Jan 1, 1900

I have no idea why the different Epochs, but did you notice that the difference is 70 years? YEP!!!

Okay, so Microsoft Products use the NTP Epoch (i.e. SQL Server, Excel, Access, etc) as a reference to build it’s Date objects. Unix, Macintosh, Java, and C / C++ uses the Unix Epoch as a reference for it’s date objects. Cisco uses Unix Epoch to export its timestamps.

So, basically, we have to add 25,569 days (70 years, approx) to the NTP Epoch, in order to get valid results in NTP Epoch-type systems (Excel, SQL Server, etc).

Convert a timestamp in JAVA:

public static void main(String[] args){

// declare our timestamp in seconds

long timestamp = 1198167416;

// Since timestamp is in seconds, but Java Date works in milliseconds,

// convert to milliseconds
Date mydate = new Date(timestamp*1000);

// Format how the date is displayed to us

SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat(”dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss”);

// Print the date to standard out.

System.out.println(formatter.format(mydate));
}

Convert a timestamp in Excel (Assuming your timestamp to convert is in column A1):

A1/86400+25569

Then, just format the cells as “Date”. So, to explain the Excel formula:

1). Divide the timestamp by the number of seconds in a day. This will give you the number of days

2). Add 25569 days to the already converted days, to take into account the difference between Unix Epoch and NTP Epoch shift.

Cisco IOS - Order of Operations

So, for the first time, I had to NAT an IPSec tunnel for a vendor, due to overlapping networks.  I know the fundamentals, but have never actually done it.

First, define the vpn traffic…. check

Next, define the  nat traffic…. check

Map the traffic to the cryptomap….check

Create the access-list to filter the VPN Traffic…..no check…. ummm…. okay.. so here is where I needed some help.  Does the ACL get hit first, and THEN NAT?  If so, I’ll need to use the NAT address in the ACL.  But, what if NAT gets hit first?  Then I’ll have to use my private address in the ACL.

What to do?  Well, visit the irc chat room #cisco, that’s what.  They sent me to an incredible post which details the operations of both ingress and egress in a Cisco IOS system.

Very handy!  ….. <Aaron is printing>….

Bill Gates - Last day at Microsoft Video

So, ever wonder how the last day of Bill Gates would go? Hysterical video. I love the cameo shots of all the people! I didn’t realize Bill Gates even had a sense of humor?