http://teneo.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/firefox-vs-ie-memory-usage/ Aaron's blog on Networking, and Enterprise Technology Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:08:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU http://teneo.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/firefox-vs-ie-memory-usage/#comment-262 Dan Mon, 12 May 2008 01:51:54 +0000 http://teneo.wordpress.com/?p=84#comment-262 I tend to use Opera for anything I tend to leave open for long periods of time. Despite the lack of compatibility with some things, it tends to be very good at managing memory usage. The one thing problem I have seen with Opera is certain sites that are more 'interactive' with the browser (Facebook is a prime example) will give Opera fits within an hour or so. Other sites that are simpler (more HTML than anything else) tend to be fine. I tend to use Opera for anything I tend to leave open for long periods of time. Despite the lack of compatibility with some things, it tends to be very good at managing memory usage. The one thing problem I have seen with Opera is certain sites that are more ‘interactive’ with the browser (Facebook is a prime example) will give Opera fits within an hour or so. Other sites that are simpler (more HTML than anything else) tend to be fine.

]]> http://teneo.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/firefox-vs-ie-memory-usage/#comment-256 John Sat, 03 May 2008 05:47:28 +0000 http://teneo.wordpress.com/?p=84#comment-256 I tend to use IETab for certain clients that require IE to run certain applications such as ActiveX based among other things. Basically it allows you to set certain pages to load IE inside of Firefox such as WindowsUpdate. I tend to use IETab for certain clients that require IE to run certain applications such as ActiveX based among other things. Basically it allows you to set certain pages to load IE inside of Firefox such as WindowsUpdate.

]]>